Mr. Vladimir Yakunin,
President of the World Public Forum,
Mr. Miloš Zeman, former
Prime Minister of the Czech Republic,
Ladies and gentlemen!
Since its meetings on the
New International Economic Order (1979) and on the challenges of
Globalization (1999), the International Progress Organization has devoted
special attention to questions of a just and sustainable system of
international economic relations. In an era of global crisis such as the
one at the beginning of the 21st century, the doctrine of
“globalization” is up for review and the complex relationship between
economy and civilization requires further analysis.
The present crisis
constitutes a major challenge to the unity of Europe. The future of
Europe – as transnational project of a comprehensive and
sustainable order of peace and stability – is at stake; that future
will essentially depend on how the continent will deal with a
situation of global instability, perceived as “unintended consequence” of
globalized markets, and whether it will be able to develop a kind of
“transnational crisis management.”
It is here where the
dialogue of civilizations comes into play. Dialogue requires basic respect
for one another’s perception of the world and system of values, including
the social sphere. The “other” must be accepted as partner on an
equal level and, thus, must not be made a mere object of one’s
self-realization, whether in cultural, social or economic terms.
Though this may appear
far-fetched, the rationale of dialogue is intrinsically linked to the
economy: a system that is based on the “glorification of greed” and on
profit maximization as the only criterion of economic activity, is
not only incompatible with dialogue and peaceful co-existence, but is not
effective even in pure economic terms. As has been proven by now, the 21st
century model of “globalization” is not sustainable; to the
contrary: it has destabilized and shaken the very foundations of the
global system at all levels, not only in regard to economy and
finance. This specific model of the economy has triggered a process that
has led to new inequalities between the industrialized and the developing
worlds, and it threatens peace domestically (undermining the social
cohesion in many countries) as well as at the regional and global levels.
Furthermore, the
practices associated with “neoliberal” globalization – as propagated e.g.
by the World Economic Forum – have led to a situation in which the
predominant political and military power at the beginning of the 21st
century has been proven to be at the origin of global economic
instability, being unable and lacking the moral authority to lead the
world out of the crisis.
What is required in this
state of unprecedented “global emergency” – indeed of a
multidimensional crisis of the credibility and legitimacy of all the
dogmata of the prematurely declared era of globalization and the free
markets –, is the development of a set of clearly defined ethical norms by
which international economic and financial exchanges have to be governed.
I would like to emphasize
here the eminent role of civilizations – with their rich religious and
metaphysical heritage – in presenting an alternative vision for a
way out of the impasse into which the collapse of neoliberal globalization
has led the world. More than ever, the world needs an “Alliance of
Civilizations” that will agree on and promote a Declaration of Universal
Ethical Values as the basis of a sustainable system of international
economic exchange in the service of mankind, not merely of a multitude of
vested interests.
While imposing, in the
name of progress, a dogmatic neoliberal model of economy and finance would
be in total contradiction to dialogue, making use of the genuine
moral and social teachings of the world’s great civilizations for the
drafting of a declaration on the core values of economic activity will be
an imperative that follows from the very logic of dialogue and
peace. These civilizational values transcend the economy and are the only
basis of a sustainable and legitimate world order.
I thank you for your
attention.
***
|